Magazines
   Strategic Marketing
   Investor's Guide
   Brand Equity
   Corporate Dossier

  
  ET Headlines
  Stocks
  Forex
  World

ET InstaPoll
Will RBI's easing forex-Re swaps prompt cos to repay their ECBs?
Vote
  ET Live Quotes
Type the name of the company to get the latest BSE/NSE stock quote
   








minning for gold
____________________________________________________________

Learning Curve
Marketing to small businesses
Segmenting the small business market
The three psychographic profiles that categorize all entrepreneurs


But for every great challenge worth achieving, a long hard battle must be fought. The small business market is a slippery prize that easily wriggles from the hand of the most skilled marketer.
However, the problem with calling the small business sector a market is that markets traditionally have something to bind them together - a common theme about which all members generally agree. The small business market, on the other hand, is extremely diverse to have a common thread running across them. The very first thing needed, is thus, a way to slice and dice this market into chunks that are more homogenous. The number of employees a company has is a quick way to judge a company's size. And firm size - though it may seem to be too simplistic - is still how some of the world's best business-to-business marketers segment. The existence of employees as a gauge of the business owner's seriousness is not perfect, but in the absence of more accurate measure, it can be the most effective way to determine the size of the business.
The biggest mistake done by marketers, about segmenting the small business market, is that they tend to segment these small businesses attitudinally. They reason that the market is too diverse; therefore they need to understand what makes the different entrepreneurs tick. The result is a beautiful presentation lumping the small business owners into a variety of segments that usually make the marketers feel good for a while, before it hits them back; as they cannot map these qualitative attributes back to a company's database - result that these profiles are seldom used.
So, before the qualitative research is commissioned, the small business customers and prospects should be categorized into groups defined by something that is actionable. And how actionable something is, comes down to one word - data. The best data possible is the historical customer data as it allows calculating a client's profitability. Simply put, if the revenue generated from a customer is taken, subtracting the cost of goods or service sold to them and also deducting the cost of acquiring or servicing the customer is taken, that gives the profitability of a customer. Assume that all your customers fall in one of the three buckets as shown in the figure below. In addition to understanding the profitability, the potential of each client also needs to be assessed. Assign high potential to customers who buy from the competitors much more. Assign a customer as low-potential if the particular customer is estimated to buy most of their purchases from your company. Once the profitability of the customers is calculated, various analyzing and marketing programs can be designed for targeting them. The behavioral segments will help to access the needs of the clients whereas the profitability and potential helps in designing a desirable strategy.


After the segments based on the behavior and the potential value of the customers is created, the main question that should be answered is that what binds these buckets together. The common thread running among all the small businesses needs to be known. In addition to do a qualitative research, a number of other ways exist by which the buckets can be analyzed easily:
* Demographics of the owner: looks at the owner of the business and includes age, gender and so on.
* Firmographics: a made up word that business-to-business marketers use when referring to a company's characteristics such as the number of employees, growth rate, revenue etc.
* Vertical: refers to the industry in which a small business operates.
The key is thus not to pick just one method to look at the customers of a particular segment - successful marketers to these small businesses constantly tries to focus to the similarities of the companies in a particular bucket, trying to find out some useful similarities.
The first step in segmenting the small business market is to look at the customer base behaviorally and divide the customers into buckets based on how profitable they are to the business. The immediate procedure following this is the traits that make each bucket unique. That trait often comes down to what these customers buy, but it may so happen that the most profitable buckets have other similarities, including demographics like age, gender and ethnicity, or firmographics like employee number or industry.

Mountain climbers, Freedom fighters and Craftspeople
The very next step is to get into the heads of the entrepreneurs in each of the customer segments. Recent studies show that the small business owners can be categorized into one of the three attitudinal profiles - the mountain climbers, the freedom fighters and the craftspeople. Of the 21 million businesses in the United States, the propositions of these three categories are as shown in the chart titled “Psychographic Profiles of Small Business Owners”
Mountain Climbers are so named as these entrepreneurs are motivated by growth and achievement. For them, owning a business is all about growing something and achieving something important.
Freedom fighters, on the other hand, are motivated by independence. To these free spirits, who dislike being told what to do, owning a business is the ultimate career choice.
Craftspeople are independent professionals who choose to practice their crafts independently as opposed to working for others.


Although the mountain climbers are the smallest segment of the market, they are also the group whom the marketers find most attractive. The mountain climbers, motivated by the growth and achievement, view entrepreneurship, as being about achieving the impossible. They climb mountains in business only to reach the peak and look for the next highest point on the horizon. They are never satisfied and have an average annual growth rate of twenty per cent or more.
The mountain climbers have an interesting relationship with the money. They typically use it as a yardstick for measuring their success but are rarely motivated by it themselves. The mountain climbers are most likely to look at money as a growth fuel - the more they have, the faster and further can they push their businesses. This relationship with money often drives their decisions; they are most likely to lease equipment, minimizing their monthly payment, in an effort to keep up as much fuel at their disposal, and they lease office space instead of tying up their cash in a deposit on a building.
The mountain climbers generally tend to accept, even embrace failure. They choose to look upon failures as priceless learning experiences, certainly nothing to be embarrassed about. They are able to spin utter disasters into educational experiences. The ego of these kinds of entrepreneurs is their invaluable assets. It is often this ego that acts as a shield in times of intense turmoil. They tend to be hasty decision makers, making decisions quickly, based on a limited amount of information, unlike other managers who build a well documented case to support the wisdom of their decisions against probing superiors. Nothing speeds up the decision making process for a mountain climber more than a solid endorsement from a respected peer. They are motivated by the desire to prove someone wrong - usually an overly critical parent or a former boss. Dr. Stephen Berglas from Harvard School of Medicine, a management consultant and clinical psychologist, calls it “Entrepreneurial Avenger Syndrome".
The freedom fighters, on the other hand, are always motivated by independence. They do not want to build an empire - just a business that works. They generally run companies that have between one and fifty employees. They tend not to change from year to year, with flat annual revenue or modest growth of less than twenty per cent a year. They just cannot stand having people tell them what to do. Before starting on their own, they often spend years working for someone else, constantly dreaming of ways they could run a better business if they were in charge. This fierce sense of independence is why most of them leave good jobs to work for themselves. Compared to the mountain climbers, who are more autocratic in nature, the freedom fighters are consensus builders. They tend to hire friend and families or treat employees as if they were one of their family members. Freedom fighters often display this paternalistic style by continuing to employ weak employees despite poor performance. This closeness, akin to that in a family, makes firing someone emotionally difficult.
At its worst, the freedom fighters' independence streak can manifest itself in a form of paranoia for anything they consider “establishment". They see the world through an intensely skeptical lens, referring to big businesses and government as “them" and looking suspiciously at almost any action “they" take.
When it comes to money, the freedom fighters are more concerned with the bottom line than they are with the top. The freedom fighters live in the moment, preferring to maximize the profitability today. This price sensitivity also means that they are less likely to lease products in an effort to minimize their financing expenses. Their sense of independence also makes them wary of being beholden to a financing company. Freedom fighters are less obsessed with the idea of achievement and therefore often don't feel the need to grow to the top of the line at he expense of the bottom line. Although some celebrated examples of entrepreneurs are known for their flashy displays of wealth, most successful freedom fighters are modest about their money, using it as an internal gauge of their success as opposed to an external beacon.
Craftspeople are so named because mastering their particular craft motivates them. They do not think about themselves as a small business owners or entrepreneurs, but think of themselves in the context of their particular skill or service: as jewelers, plumbers and photographers, as an example. This category of the small businesses has seen the largest growth over the past decade. This explosion has been caused by a combination of factors. First, technology has become so inexpensive that the individual can now afford to outfit a home office with computer equipment so powerful that the largest of companies could not have afforded it thirty years ago. The second most important factor was definitely the recession that struck in the early nineties. Whether you call them free agents, hired guns, free-lancers, SOHOs (small office/home office), consultants, or gurus, craftspeople are reluctant entrepreneurs who would much prefer to practice their craft than think about managing a business. The biggest chunk of the small business market is made up of individuals who do not even think of themselves as small business owners.

This category happens to be most price-sensitive, when compared to the other normal categories. The Craftsperson's stinginess stems from a simplistic approach to business.
Most of them do not distinguish their personal and business bank accounts in their mind. Many of them have separated their business banking on paper; in reality, however; they see their money as one big (or small) pot. As a result, purchases that would be considered a cost of doing business from freedom fighters and mountain climbers are postponed and considered for months by the craftspeople.
Marketers, who are price leaders, in their category, should move full steam ahead. If, however, the marketer is a premium-based product, think twice about selling to the craftsperson market.


The above article has been extracted and condensed from “Drilling for Gold - How companies can successfully market to small businesses” by John Warrillo, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 2002. All rights of the authors and publisher are reserved.


 
Times Group Sites-The Times Of India  | The Economic Times | Navbharat Times  | ET Invest | ETintelligence | Femina  | Filmfare  |  Times Classifieds  |  Property Times  |  Education Times |  Maharashtra Times | Responservice  | Indianadsabroad  | Jobs & Careers  | Times Multimedia